Sweden vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Sweden
68
in 2014
Tajikistan
67.42
in 2014
Sweden rank
30th
Tajikistan rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Sweden
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 68 against 67.42 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.58.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Sweden ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.48 | 67.42 | 0.9404 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 68.12 | 67.42 | 0.6961 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Sweden or Tajikistan?
- Sweden, at 68 against 67.42 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 0.58, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sweden and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Sweden ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.