Suriname vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Suriname
28.84
in 2014
East Timor
3.59
in 2014
Suriname rank
181st
East Timor rank
184th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Suriname
- East Timor
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 28.84 against 3.59 in East Timor, a difference of 25.25.
That makes Suriname's figure about 8.0 times East Timor's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 181st and East Timor ranks 184th of 184 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.84 | 2.08 | 26.75 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 28.84 | 3.59 | 25.25 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Suriname or East Timor?
- Suriname, at 28.84 against 3.59 in East Timor as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Suriname and East Timor?
- 25.25, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Suriname and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Suriname ranks 181st and East Timor ranks 184th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.