Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Solomon Islands
43.49
in 2014
Zimbabwe
43.25
in 2014
Solomon Islands rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
152nd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Zimbabwe
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 43.49 against 43.25 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.24.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 43.49 62.41 18.92 Zimbabwe
2010s 43.49 41.92 1.57 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Solomon Islands or Zimbabwe?
Solomon Islands, at 43.49 against 43.25 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
0.24, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Solomon Islands ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.