Slovenia vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Slovenia
52.4
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
52.18
in 2014
Slovenia rank
113th
United Arab Emirates rank
115th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Slovenia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 52.4 against 52.18 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Slovenia ranks 113th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.67 | 51.08 | 2.42 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 52.07 | 52.04 | 0.0272 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Slovenia or United Arab Emirates?
- Slovenia, at 52.4 against 52.18 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Slovenia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.22, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and United Arab Emirates?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Slovenia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Slovenia ranks 113th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.