Romania vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Romania
66.11
in 2014
Tonga
65.65
in 2014
Romania rank
45th
Tonga rank
48th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Romania
- Tonga
How they compare
Romania currently reports 66.11 against 65.65 in Tonga, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 45th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.77 | 63.15 | 4.62 | Romania |
| 2010s | 66.11 | 65.65 | 0.4611 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Romania or Tonga?
- Romania, at 66.11 against 65.65 in Tonga as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Romania and Tonga?
- 0.46, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tonga?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Romania and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Romania ranks 45th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.