Romania vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Romania
66.11
in 2014
South Africa
66.14
in 2014
Romania rank
45th
South Africa rank
44th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Romania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 66.14 against 66.11 in Romania, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 45th and South Africa ranks 44th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.77 | 65.1 | 2.67 | Romania |
| 2010s | 66.11 | 66.14 | 0.0293 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Romania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 66.14 against 66.11 in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Romania and South Africa?
- 0.03, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Romania ranks 45th and South Africa ranks 44th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.