Poland vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Poland
64.83
in 2014
Tonga
65.65
in 2014
Poland rank
51st
Tonga rank
48th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Poland
  • Tonga
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 65.65 against 64.83 in Poland, a difference of 0.82.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 54.35 63.15 8.8 Tonga
2010s 61.66 65.65 3.99 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Poland or Tonga?
Tonga, at 65.65 against 64.83 in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Poland and Tonga?
0.82, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tonga?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Poland and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Poland ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.