North Macedonia vs Venezuela: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

North Macedonia
57.71
in 2014
Venezuela
57.88
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
84th
Venezuela rank
81st

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Venezuela
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Venezuela currently reports 57.88 against 57.71 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.17.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 84th and Venezuela ranks 81st of 181 countries.

Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Venezuela Difference Ahead
2000s 57.32 63.62 6.3 Venezuela
2010s 56.91 61.05 4.14 Venezuela

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Venezuela?
Venezuela, at 57.88 against 57.71 in North Macedonia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Venezuela?
0.17, with Venezuela ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Venezuela?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do North Macedonia and Venezuela rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 84th and Venezuela ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.