Nepal vs Oman: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Nepal
49.65
in 2014
Oman
50.07
in 2014
Nepal rank
127th
Oman rank
125th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 50.07 against 49.65 in Nepal, a difference of 0.42.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 127th and Oman ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.51 | 50.07 | 3.55 | Oman |
| 2010s | 49.03 | 50.07 | 1.04 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Nepal or Oman?
- Oman, at 50.07 against 49.65 in Nepal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Nepal and Oman?
- 0.42, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oman?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Nepal and Oman rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Nepal ranks 127th and Oman ranks 125th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.