Mongolia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
70.17
in 2014
Thailand
69.33
in 2014
Mongolia rank
23rd
Thailand rank
25th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Thailand
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 70.17 against 69.33 in Thailand, a difference of 0.84.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 23rd and Thailand ranks 25th of 181 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 71.81 69.95 1.85 Mongolia
2010s 71.15 70.26 0.8931 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Thailand?
Mongolia, at 70.17 against 69.33 in Thailand as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Thailand?
0.84, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Thailand?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Mongolia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Thailand ranks 25th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.