Micronesia (country) vs Pakistan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Micronesia (country)
40.85
in 2014
Pakistan
40.32
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
159th
Pakistan rank
162nd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Pakistan
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 40.85 against 40.32 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.85 | 43.56 | 2.71 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 40.85 | 40.48 | 0.3662 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Pakistan?
- Micronesia (country), at 40.85 against 40.32 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Pakistan?
- 0.53, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Pakistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Pakistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.