Mauritius vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Mauritius
66.22
in 2014
Tanzania
66.17
in 2014
Mauritius rank
42nd
Tanzania rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Tanzania
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 66.22 against 66.17 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tanzania ahead.
Mauritius ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.36 | 66.17 | 5.82 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 64.6 | 66.17 | 1.58 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Tanzania?
- Mauritius, at 66.22 against 66.17 in Tanzania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Tanzania?
- 0.05, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tanzania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.