Mauritius vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Mauritius
66.22
in 2014
South Africa
66.14
in 2014
Mauritius rank
42nd
South Africa rank
44th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- South Africa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 66.22 against 66.14 in South Africa, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Africa ahead.
Mauritius ranks 42nd and South Africa ranks 44th of 181 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.36 | 65.1 | 4.74 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 64.6 | 66.14 | 1.54 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or South Africa?
- Mauritius, at 66.22 against 66.14 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and South Africa?
- 0.08, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 42nd and South Africa ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.