Marshall Islands vs Morocco: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Marshall Islands
58.82
in 2014
Morocco
59.65
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
75th
Morocco rank
72nd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Morocco
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 59.65 against 58.82 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.83.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 72nd of 181 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Morocco Difference Ahead
2000s 58.82 59.65 0.8292 Morocco
2010s 58.82 59.65 0.8292 Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands or Morocco?
Morocco, at 59.65 against 58.82 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands and Morocco?
0.83, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Morocco?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Marshall Islands and Morocco rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Marshall Islands ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 72nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.