Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Marshall Islands
58.82
in 2014
Mauritania
58.47
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
75th
Mauritania rank
77th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 58.82 against 58.47 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.35.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 75th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 181 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 58.82 57.29 1.54 Marshall Islands
2010s 58.82 58.47 0.3583 Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands or Mauritania?
Marshall Islands, at 58.82 against 58.47 in Mauritania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
0.35, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Marshall Islands and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Marshall Islands ranks 75th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.