Malaysia vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
69.16
in 2014
Uzbekistan
68.65
in 2014
Malaysia rank
26th
Uzbekistan rank
29th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 69.16 against 68.65 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.3 | 67.15 | 0.1432 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 70.42 | 68.02 | 2.39 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Uzbekistan?
- Malaysia, at 69.16 against 68.65 in Uzbekistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.51, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.