Malaysia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
69.16
in 2014
Thailand
69.33
in 2014
Malaysia rank
26th
Thailand rank
25th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 69.33 against 69.16 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Thailand ahead.
Malaysia ranks 26th and Thailand ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.3 | 69.95 | 2.66 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 70.42 | 70.26 | 0.161 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 69.33 against 69.16 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Thailand?
- 0.17, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Thailand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 26th and Thailand ranks 25th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.