Malaysia vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
69.16
in 2014
Mongolia
70.17
in 2014
Malaysia rank
26th
Mongolia rank
23rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 70.17 against 69.16 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.3 | 71.81 | 4.51 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 70.42 | 71.15 | 0.7322 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 70.17 against 69.16 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Mongolia?
- 1.01, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mongolia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.