Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Malawi
43.73
in 2014
Zimbabwe
43.25
in 2014
Malawi rank
152nd
Zimbabwe rank
155th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 43.73 against 43.25 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 184 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.67 | 62.41 | 26.74 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 39.25 | 41.92 | 2.67 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Malawi, at 43.73 against 43.25 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.48, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Malawi ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.