Malawi vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Malawi
43.73
in 2014
Solomon Islands
43.49
in 2014
Malawi rank
149th
Solomon Islands rank
151st

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malawi
  • Solomon Islands
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 43.73 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.24.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Malawi ranks 149th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 181 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 35.67 43.49 7.82 Solomon Islands
2010s 39.25 43.49 4.23 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Malawi or Solomon Islands?
Malawi, at 43.73 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Malawi and Solomon Islands?
0.24, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Solomon Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Malawi and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Malawi ranks 149th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.