Lithuania vs Russia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Lithuania
73.94
in 2014
Russia
74.16
in 2014
Lithuania rank
18th
Russia rank
17th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Russia
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Russia currently reports 74.16 against 73.94 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 18th and Russia ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Russia Difference Ahead
2000s 76.92 76.03 0.889 Lithuania
2010s 73.87 75.32 1.45 Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Lithuania or Russia?
Russia, at 74.16 against 73.94 in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Lithuania and Russia?
0.22, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Russia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Lithuania and Russia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Lithuania ranks 18th and Russia ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.