Lebanon vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Lebanon
55.4
in 2014
Uruguay
55.02
in 2014
Lebanon rank
102nd
Uruguay rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Uruguay
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 55.4 against 55.02 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.38.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 102nd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 181 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.4 | 55.15 | 0.248 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 55.4 | 55.07 | 0.33 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Lebanon or Uruguay?
- Lebanon, at 55.4 against 55.02 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Lebanon and Uruguay?
- 0.38, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 102nd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.