Lebanon vs Panama: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Lebanon
55.4
in 2014
Panama
56.02
in 2014
Lebanon rank
102nd
Panama rank
99th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 56.02 against 55.4 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 99th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.4 | 54.37 | 1.03 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 55.4 | 57.73 | 2.33 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Lebanon or Panama?
- Panama, at 56.02 against 55.4 in Lebanon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Lebanon and Panama?
- 0.62, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Panama?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and Panama rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 102nd and Panama ranks 99th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.