Kyrgyzstan vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kyrgyzstan
56.78
in 2014
Nigeria
56.31
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan rank
93rd
Nigeria rank
96th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nigeria
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 56.78 against 56.31 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.47.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd and Nigeria ranks 96th of 181 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.63 | 34.02 | 30.61 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 58.35 | 45.13 | 13.23 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kyrgyzstan or Nigeria?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 56.78 against 56.31 in Nigeria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria?
- 0.47, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd and Nigeria ranks 96th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.