Kosovo vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kosovo
48.59
in 2014
Singapore
89.16
in 2014
Kosovo rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kosovo
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 89.16 against 48.59 in Kosovo, a difference of 40.57.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.8 times Kosovo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.13 | 89.54 | 43.41 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 46.63 | 89.31 | 42.69 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kosovo or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 89.16 against 48.59 in Kosovo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kosovo and Singapore?
- 40.57, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.