Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
48.59
in 2014
Madagascar
49.21
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
135th
Madagascar rank
132nd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 49.21 against 48.59 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 135th and Madagascar ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.13 | 45.91 | 0.222 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 46.63 | 46.57 | 0.0539 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 49.21 against 48.59 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Madagascar?
- 0.62, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Madagascar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Madagascar rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 135th and Madagascar ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.