South Korea vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

South Korea
79.17
in 2014
Luxembourg
85.7
in 2014
South Korea rank
5th
Luxembourg rank
2nd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Luxembourg
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 85.7 against 79.17 in South Korea, a difference of 6.53.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 181 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 78.73 85.95 7.22 Luxembourg
2010s 79.41 85.7 6.29 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, South Korea or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 85.7 against 79.17 in South Korea as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between South Korea and Luxembourg?
6.53, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do South Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
South Korea ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.