Kenya vs Oman: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Kenya
50.98
in 2014
Oman
50.07
in 2014
Kenya rank
122nd
Oman rank
125th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Kenya
  • Oman
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 50.98 against 50.07 in Oman, a difference of 0.91.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 122nd and Oman ranks 125th of 181 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Oman Difference Ahead
2000s 59.32 50.07 9.26 Kenya
2010s 52.65 50.07 2.58 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kenya or Oman?
Kenya, at 50.98 against 50.07 in Oman as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kenya and Oman?
0.91, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Oman?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Kenya and Oman rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Kenya ranks 122nd and Oman ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.