Japan vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Japan
73.25
in 2014
Rwanda
70.46
in 2014
Japan rank
20th
Rwanda rank
21st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Japan currently reports 73.25 against 70.46 in Rwanda, a difference of 2.79.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 181 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.95 | 60.47 | 9.47 | Japan |
| 2010s | 71.27 | 66.03 | 5.24 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Japan or Rwanda?
- Japan, at 73.25 against 70.46 in Rwanda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Japan and Rwanda?
- 2.79, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.