Japan vs Russia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Japan
73.25
in 2014
Russia
74.16
in 2014
Japan rank
20th
Russia rank
17th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 74.16 against 73.25 in Japan, a difference of 0.91.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 20th and Russia ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.95 | 76.03 | 6.08 | Russia |
| 2010s | 71.27 | 75.32 | 4.05 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Japan or Russia?
- Russia, at 74.16 against 73.25 in Japan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Japan and Russia?
- 0.91, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Russia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Russia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 20th and Russia ranks 17th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.