Japan vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Japan
73.25
in 2014
Mongolia
70.17
in 2014
Japan rank
20th
Mongolia rank
23rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 73.25 against 70.17 in Mongolia, a difference of 3.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Japan ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.95 | 71.81 | 1.86 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 71.27 | 71.15 | 0.1188 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Japan or Mongolia?
- Japan, at 73.25 against 70.17 in Mongolia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Japan and Mongolia?
- 3.08, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mongolia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.