Jamaica vs State of Palestine: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jamaica
54.96
in 2014
State of Palestine
54.48
in 2014
Jamaica rank
104th
State of Palestine rank
106th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- State of Palestine
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 54.96 against 54.48 in State of Palestine, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 104th and State of Palestine ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and State of Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | State of Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.42 | 50.56 | 3.86 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 53.81 | 54.48 | 0.6697 | State of Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jamaica or State of Palestine?
- Jamaica, at 54.96 against 54.48 in State of Palestine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jamaica and State of Palestine?
- 0.48, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and State of Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and State of Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 104th and State of Palestine ranks 106th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.