Jamaica vs Lebanon: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jamaica
54.96
in 2014
Lebanon
55.4
in 2014
Jamaica rank
104th
Lebanon rank
102nd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 55.4 against 54.96 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 104th and Lebanon ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.59 | 55.4 | 0.812 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 53.81 | 55.4 | 1.59 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jamaica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 55.4 against 54.96 in Jamaica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 0.44, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and Lebanon rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 104th and Lebanon ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.