Israel vs Lesotho: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Israel
52.61
in 2014
Lesotho
53.94
in 2014
Israel rank
111th
Lesotho rank
109th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 53.94 against 52.61 in Israel, a difference of 1.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 111th and Lesotho ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.93 | 46.84 | 8.09 | Israel |
| 2010s | 53.54 | 51.1 | 2.43 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Israel or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 53.94 against 52.61 in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Israel and Lesotho?
- 1.33, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Lesotho?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Lesotho rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 111th and Lesotho ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.