Iraq vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Iraq
47.32
in 2014
Mozambique
48
in 2014
Iraq rank
139th
Mozambique rank
137th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Iraq
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 48 against 47.32 in Iraq, a difference of 0.68.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 139th and Mozambique ranks 137th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46 | 45.69 | 0.3058 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 47.32 | 48 | 0.6776 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Iraq or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 48 against 47.32 in Iraq as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Iraq and Mozambique?
- 0.68, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Mozambique?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Iraq and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Iraq ranks 139th and Mozambique ranks 137th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.