Indonesia vs Italy: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Indonesia
44.31
in 2014
Italy
45.42
in 2014
Indonesia rank
144th
Italy rank
141st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 45.42 against 44.31 in Indonesia, a difference of 1.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 144th and Italy ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.29 | 37.1 | 0.194 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 39.65 | 43.62 | 3.97 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Indonesia or Italy?
- Italy, at 45.42 against 44.31 in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Indonesia and Italy?
- 1.11, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Italy?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Italy rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 144th and Italy ranks 141st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.