India vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

India
29.04
in 2014
Suriname
28.84
in 2014
India rank
177th
Suriname rank
178th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • India
  • Suriname
0102030200320082014

How they compare

India currently reports 29.04 against 28.84 in Suriname, a difference of 0.2.

Across all 10 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

India ranks 177th and Suriname ranks 178th of 181 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 29.04 28.84 0.2038 India
2010s 29.04 28.84 0.2038 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, India or Suriname?
India, at 29.04 against 28.84 in Suriname as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between India and Suriname?
0.2, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do India and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
India ranks 177th and Suriname ranks 178th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.