Hungary vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Hungary
67.62
in 2014
Uzbekistan
68.65
in 2014
Hungary rank
31st
Uzbekistan rank
29th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hungary
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 68.65 against 67.62 in Hungary, a difference of 1.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.03 | 67.15 | 1.87 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 67.62 | 68.02 | 0.4036 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Hungary or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 68.65 against 67.62 in Hungary as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Hungary and Uzbekistan?
- 1.03, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Hungary ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.