Hong Kong, China vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong, China
78.74
in 2014
New Zealand
77.84
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
6th
New Zealand rank
8th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 78.74 against 77.84 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.9.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.5 | 79.77 | 1.73 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 78.55 | 78.56 | 0.0087 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, China, at 78.74 against 77.84 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 0.9, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.