Hong Kong vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong
78.74
in 2014
South Korea
79.17
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
6th
South Korea rank
5th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 79.17 against 78.74 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.5 | 78.73 | 2.77 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 78.55 | 79.41 | 0.8595 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 79.17 against 78.74 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 0.43, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 5th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.