Hong Kong vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong
78.74
in 2014
Iceland
82.3
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
6th
Iceland rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 82.3 against 78.74 in Hong Kong, a difference of 3.56.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.45 | 83.32 | 1.86 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 78.55 | 82.3 | 3.75 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 82.3 against 78.74 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 3.56, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.