Haiti vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Haiti
59.32
in 2014
Marshall Islands
58.82
in 2014
Haiti rank
74th
Marshall Islands rank
75th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Haiti
  • Marshall Islands
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 59.32 against 58.82 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Haiti ranks 74th and Marshall Islands ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 58.28 58.82 0.5456 Marshall Islands
2010s 59.11 58.82 0.2877 Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Haiti or Marshall Islands?
Haiti, at 59.32 against 58.82 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Haiti and Marshall Islands?
0.5, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Marshall Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Haiti and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Haiti ranks 74th and Marshall Islands ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.