Guinea-Bissau vs Liberia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
36.41
in 2014
Liberia
34.88
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
165th
Liberia rank
168th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Liberia
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 36.41 against 34.88 in Liberia, a difference of 1.53.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 165th and Liberia ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 35.37 33.84 1.53 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 36.41 34.47 1.95 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Liberia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 36.41 against 34.88 in Liberia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Liberia?
1.53, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Liberia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Liberia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 165th and Liberia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.