Guinea-Bissau vs Honduras: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
36.41
in 2014
Honduras
36.55
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
165th
Honduras rank
164th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Honduras
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 36.55 against 36.41 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.14.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 165th and Honduras ranks 164th of 181 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 35.37 39.18 3.81 Honduras
2010s 36.41 37.07 0.6602 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Honduras?
Honduras, at 36.55 against 36.41 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Honduras?
0.14, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Honduras?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Honduras rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 165th and Honduras ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.