Guatemala vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Guatemala
46.35
in 2014
Mozambique
48
in 2014
Guatemala rank
137th
Mozambique rank
134th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Guatemala
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 48 against 46.35 in Guatemala, a difference of 1.65.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 137th and Mozambique ranks 134th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.35 | 45.49 | 0.8616 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 46.35 | 48 | 1.65 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Guatemala or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 48 against 46.35 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 1.65, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Guatemala ranks 137th and Mozambique ranks 134th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.