Guatemala vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Guatemala
46.35
in 2014
Iraq
47.32
in 2014
Guatemala rank
137th
Iraq rank
136th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Guatemala
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 47.32 against 46.35 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.97.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 137th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.35 | 46 | 0.3537 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 46.35 | 47.32 | 0.9711 | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Guatemala or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 47.32 against 46.35 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Guatemala and Iraq?
- 0.97, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Iraq?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Guatemala ranks 137th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.