Grenada vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Grenada
46.25
in 2014
Iraq
47.32
in 2014
Grenada rank
138th
Iraq rank
136th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 47.32 against 46.25 in Grenada, a difference of 1.07.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 138th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.86 | 46.06 | 1.2 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 46.25 | 47.32 | 1.07 | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Grenada or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 47.32 against 46.25 in Grenada as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Grenada and Iraq?
- 1.07, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Iraq?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Grenada and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Grenada ranks 138th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.