Ghana vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Ghana
57.59
in 2014
Zambia
57.53
in 2014
Ghana rank
88th
Zambia rank
89th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ghana
  • Zambia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 57.59 against 57.53 in Zambia, a difference of 0.06.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 89th of 181 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 64.15 60.26 3.89 Ghana
2010s 62.49 57.53 4.96 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Ghana or Zambia?
Ghana, at 57.59 against 57.53 in Zambia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Ghana and Zambia?
0.06, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zambia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Ghana and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Ghana ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 89th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.