Georgia vs Japan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Georgia
73.66
in 2014
Japan
73.25
in 2014
Georgia rank
19th
Japan rank
20th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Japan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 73.66 against 73.25 in Japan, a difference of 0.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Georgia ranks 19th and Japan ranks 20th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.64 | 69.95 | 4.31 | Japan |
| 2010s | 72.41 | 71.27 | 1.14 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Georgia or Japan?
- Georgia, at 73.66 against 73.25 in Japan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Georgia and Japan?
- 0.41, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Japan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 19th and Japan ranks 20th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.