Finland vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Finland
70.45
in 2014
Mongolia
70.17
in 2014
Finland rank
22nd
Mongolia rank
23rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Mongolia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 70.45 against 70.17 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.28.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.66 | 71.81 | 5.85 | Finland |
| 2010s | 72.47 | 71.15 | 1.32 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Finland or Mongolia?
- Finland, at 70.45 against 70.17 in Mongolia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Finland and Mongolia?
- 0.28, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mongolia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.